Click to Read
Overview | Data | Obtain this publication | Additional information
The New Zealand economy is beginning to gain some momentum, with post‑earthquake reconstruction, business investment and household spending gathering pace. Risks to growth remain, however, stemming from high private debt levels, weak foreign demand, large external imbalances, volatile terms of trade, a severe drought and an exchange rate that appears overvalued. The main structural challenge will be to create the conditions that encourage resources to shift towards more sustainable sources of prosperity. Incomes per head are well below the OECD average, and productivity growth has been sluggish for a long time. Lifting living standards sustainably and equitably will require structural reforms to improve productivity performance and the quality of human capital.
Gaps in GDP per capita and productivity remain wide
Gap to the upper half of OECD countries1, per cent
1. Percentage gap with respect to the simple average of the highest 17 OECD Countries in terms of GDP
Source: OECD (2013), Economic Policy Reforms 2013: Going for growth, OECD Publishing
Download Data in Excel
Macroeconomic policies strike the right balance between supporting the recovery and ensuring medium‑term sustainability. Monetary policy is appropriately accommodative, given the high exchange rate, weak employment growth and subdued inflation. However, domestic demand is firming, and price pressures from earthquake rebuilding and housing markets are likely to strengthen. The largely Australian owned banking system is in good shape, and effectively supervised, but rising house prices could pose risks to financial stability. Fiscal consolidation is on track to restoring surpluses. Achieving sustained reductions in government debt will establish a favourable starting position for confronting the longer‑term cost pressures resulting from demographic ageing. It will also tend to raise national saving rates, thereby reducing external vulnerabilities.
Policy makers are increasingly attuned to social equity and welfare. Though New Zealand ranks highly on many dimensions of well‑being, some show a wide dispersion. The redistributive power of the tax and transfer system is around the OECD average. To soften the impact of henceforth tight budgets on social protection, reforms are underway for improved prioritisation, efficiency and coherence in service delivery by central government. Tax and spending changes to bolster fiscal policy’s contributions to growth, equity and the environment remain important. Welfare reforms are attempting to reduce long‑run benefit dependency by emphasising education and training of at‑risk youth, with greater conditionality on beneficiaries and strengthened accountability on public and private providers. Improving education, health, employment and social outcomes for the large Maori and Pacific minorities is needed to reduce social disparities.
Boosting productivity is key to long‑term growth prospects. Low trade intensity and limited engagement in global value chains suggest New Zealand is not reaping the full productivity‑enhancing benefits of globalisation, perhaps in part because of the persistent overvaluation of the exchange rate. Inefficiencies in the information and communications technology infrastructure may undermine international connectedness. Regulatory uncertainties may be stunting competitive pressures and opportunities for foreign investment. Meanwhile, low levels of research and development may also be impeding the adoption of foreign technologies and ideas. New Zealand makes generally efficient use of its abundant natural capital, which bodes well for the sustainability of growth. The carbon price signal remains muted in the absence of internationally agreed emissions targets, and some tax settings appear to favour fossil fuel exploration.
There are weaknesses in school‑to‑work transitions, notably among ethnic minorities, hindering the development and use of the nation’s human capital. Standardised tests indicate a long “tail” of school underachievers, despite high average scores. The high drop‑out rate is a concern; as part of its growth agenda, the government aims to reduce it rapidly. Lack of school qualifications results in youth unemployment, which has increased sharply since the crisis, and high rates of youth neither in education nor in employment or training. The government has targeted improved teaching quality to reduce disparities in scholastic achievement. It has also created new vocational pathways to engage at‑risk youth and to strengthen education–work linkages.
Click on link to Access Data
- Macroeconomic indicators
- Better life index
- Revenues from environmentally related taxes
- The less educated and ethnic minorities have borne the brunt of rising unemployment
- NEET rate for youth aged 15-24
- Market returns to education are comparatively low
- PISA results for New Zealand are characterised by high means but high dispersion as well
- Contributions to growth in real GDP per capita in constant USD 2005 PPPs
- Trade intensity¹
- Financial support for private R&D investment
- Total wealth per capita
- Educational attainment of 25-64 year-olds
How to obtain this publication
The complete edition of the Economic Survey of New Zealand is available from:
For further information please contact the New Zealand Desk at the OECD Economics Department at email@example.com.
The Secretariat’s draft report was prepared for the Committee by Alexandra Bibbee and Calista Cheung under the supervision of Peter Jarrett. Research and editorial assistance was provided by Françoise Correia.