|
One sixth of the world's population lives in fragile states, countries faced with disproportionate levels of poverty and instability, whose citizens struggle to meet basic needs.
The OECD monitors resource flows to fragile states in an effort to help inform donor decisions and increase transparency and co-ordination. In 2006, donors have responded to the challenges posed by fragile states with more aid (USD 26.8 billion) but 75 percent of this aid benefitted just five countries: Nigeria, Afghanistan, Sudan, DRC and Cameroon, and half of it is debt relief. The 2007 exercise identified three types of countries requiring special attention: (i) Countries receiving less aid than would be predicted given their high level of need, compared to countries with similar policy and institutional performance ratings; (ii) Countries with high level of need and weak governance or low capacity; (iii) Countries with access to only one, two, or three key bilateral donors.
Recognizing that aid is only part of the picture, the OECD also tracks non-aid flows to fragile states such as security-related expenditures; domestic revenues, including from natural resources; remittances and foreign direct investment.
Click here for the 2007 Report
See also:
Monitoring Resource Flows to Fragile States, 2006 Fact Sheet
Monitoring Resource Flows to Fragile States, 2006 Report
Monitoring Resource Flows to Fragile States, 2006 Report, statistical annex
Monitoring Resource Flows to Fragile States, 2005 Report
Other Background documents
-
Aid Allocation and Fragile States (Mark McGillivray, 2005)
This paper summarises research on aid allocation and effectiveness, highlighting the current findings of the studies below. It looks at how aid should and is being allocated across all developing countries, with particular reference to fragile states.
-
-
-
|