English, PDF, 948kb
This Rapid Review is designed to provide timely feedback on the appropriateness and effectiveness of the United Kingdom Government’s response. While not a comprehensive assessment, this review aims to draw out key messages from observations and interactions with intended beneficiaries and humanitarian actors to promote learning by DFID and its partners.
English, PDF, 543kb
The purpose of this evaluation is to inform design and programming for DFID’s Somalia Stability Programme (SSP), the multi-donor Somalia Stability Fund (SSF), and the British Office for Somalia’s stabilisation efforts. It is undertaken at a time when after decades of conflict, civil strife, and political turmoil there appears to be a window of opportunity that will permit the generation of more coherent government in Somalia.
English, Excel, 471kb
The ICAI report found that the Department for International Development (DFID) played a leading role in the humanitarian response, supporting some of the most vulnerable people in Kenya, Somalia and Ethiopia. DFID applied pressure to governments and other donors to act and its programmes in the field demonstrated good impact and value for money.
English, Excel, 3,580kb
Final Report on the Effects of a Community Driven Reconstruction Program in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo
This report provides the results of an assessment of the impacts of Tuungane, a major UK government funded Community Driven Reconstruction Program in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.
English, PDF, 3,374kb
Social and Economic Impacts of Tuungane - Final Report on the Effects of a Community Driven Reconstruction Program in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo
This report provides the results of an assessment of the impacts of Tuungane, a major UK government funded Community Driven Reconstruction (CDR) Program implemented by the IRC and CARE International in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The key innovation of this research is the introduction of a novel collection of measures to assess behavioral changes.
English, PDF, 2,058kb
The overall objective is to assess how well the consortium approach has improved the IERP II, its members’ capacities (operation, cooperation), and lessons learned of relevance for the model and for future programming. It seeks to review and document the best practices, successes, challenges, and recommendations for strengthening the consortium’s emergency response project with a particular view to a Phase III.
English, Excel, 2,235kb
Inter Agency Standing Committee/Humanitarian Country Team Evaluation of the Humanitarian Response to South Central Somalia (2005-2010)
This is the report of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee Evaluation of the Humanitarian Response to South Central Somalia from 2005 to 2010.
English, , 1,697kb
This quick guide distils key findings and emerging lessons from a selection of available evaluations of the response to Haiti’s earthquake in January 2010.
English, , 4,382kb
Humanitarian and Reconstruction Assistance to Afghanistan, 2001 - 2005: From Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom; A Joint Evaluation
A Joint Evaluation by Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom
English, PDF, 49kb
Iraq is not Afghanistan and it is not the Balkans, but lessons need to be learned from these two recent touchstones of humanitarian experience. There are similarities to Afghanistan in the expanse of the country and the regional socio-political dynamics. There are also similarities to the Balkans in the need to address a crisis with a relatively urbanized, highly educated and (formerly) well off population.