English, Excel, 1,357kb
The purpose of this review is to provide an independent, evidence-based assessment of the humanitarian and development effectiveness of WFP. The review was based on the content of 52 WFP evaluations published between 2006 and 2011.
English, Excel, 1,921kb
The purpose of this review is to provide an independent, evidence-based assessment of the development effectiveness of UNDP. The review synthesized 55 evaluations that concentrated on UNDP programming between 2005 and 2011.
English, PDF, 1,908kb
The Health Results Innovations Trust Fund is a multi-donor trust fund supported by the governments of Norway and the United Kingdom and managed by the World Bank. This evaluation is the first in a series of evaluations which will take place over the course of the programme.
English, , 354kb
DFID's choice of UNDP as the primary channel for electoral assistance is credible. DFID should, however, make efforts to cultivate alternative or additional deliverypartners to complement its work with UNDP.
English, , 1,298kb
The purpose of the review is to provide an independent and evidence-based assessment of the humanitarian and development effectiveness of WFP operations (hereafter referred to as "programs") for use by external stakeholders, primarily bilateral development agencies.
English, , 1,086kb
The purpose of the review is to provide an independent and evidence-based assessment of the development effectiveness of UNDP programs for use by external stakeholders, primarily bilateral development agencies.
English, PDF, 221kb
The Department of Finance, in cooperation with Irish Aid, produces an Annual Report detailing and evaluating Ireland’s participation in the World Bank and IMF.
English, , 883kb
The purpose of this Professional Peer Review is to provide an independent assessment of the functioning and quality of the UNEP evaluation function. The peer review serves to enhance knowledge about, confidence in and use of evaluations by governing bodies of UNEP.
English, , 994kb
The panel finds that, generally, evaluations conducted are balanced, producing reports of good quality and that the evaluations carried out have been found to be useful. There presently, however, no Evaluation Policy in place and no clear definition of roles for evaluation planning.
English, , 871kb
This report covers DFID’s systems and controls of assessment but not the value for money or effectiveness of the programmes themselves.