English, , 37kb
Does Sida conceptualize the linkages between the environment and poverty reduction in accordance with global norm?
English, , 677kb
The Asian Development Bank's Shanxi Environment Improvement Project was selected for evaluation by the Independent Evaluation Department 3 years after completion to provide lessons and recommendation to future projects of this nature.
English, , 2,913kb
This evaluation looked at the contribution of Finland to the natural disaster prevention and mitigation, particularly from the perspective of the poor and the vulnerable.
English, , 2,018kb
The main purpose of this evaluation was to investigate the added value of the integration of biodiversity issues in SDC cooperation strategies in the Andean Region.
English, , 972kb
This synthesis study is based on a number of evaluations and specialised articles by a selection of multilateral organisations engaged in environmental assistance. These evaluation reports and specialised articles have been selected by Norad’s Evaluation Department.
English, , 1,226kb
The objective of the Evaluation was to analyze and document the results and lessons learned from the operations of the LDCF in financing and promoting climate change adaptation in the least developed countries.
English, , 689kb
The Global Invasive Species Program (GISP) is a global partnership whose mission is to conserve biodiversity and sustain human livelihoods by minimizing the spread and impact of invasive alien species (IAS).
English, , 1,693kb
Norad’s Evaluation Department decided in April 2008 to carry out baseline studies in order to better measure the results of the developmental and environmental efforts supported, in the context of Norway’s Environmental Action Plan.
English, Excel, 2,809kb
The purpose of the Professional Peer Review is to provide the GEF Council, the Assembly, the GEF Secretariat and the Evaluation Office with an independent assessment of the functioning of the GEF EO and the quality of its work.
French, , 1,911kb
Cette évaluation a pour objet de porter un jugement sur la pertinence et la cohérence de la dotation au regard des objectifs poursuivis par la France, des paysbénéficiaires et des autres outils bilatéraux et multilatéraux existants ; d’apporter deséléments pour juger de sa performance.