English, , 55kb
SADEV is planning a series of evaluations of Swedish support to the legal sector, the first of which is presented below and deals with Sida’s support to justice in reconciliation processes conflict or a post-conflict situation.
French, , 7,913kb
Ces évaluations ont porté plus spécifiquement sur des projets ou grappes de projets se situant dans divers secteurs de concentration de l’aide française, définis par les documents cadres de partenariats.
English, , 194kb
This synthesis of Country Programme Evaluations brings together findings from countries termed fragile states.
English, , 2,685kb
This report presents the findings of an evaluation of a large portion of Norwegian development cooperation that has not previously been systematically evaluated.
English, , 1,274kb
The purpose of the evaluation has been to assess whether Norway has, with its transitional assistance, contributed to increased security and stability, and whether gains achieved are likely to be sustainable.
English, , 1,516kb
Evaluation of Donor-Supported Activities in Conflict-Sensitive Development and Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding in Sri Lanka
This report describes the results of the first pilot test of the new draft OECD DAC guidance on evaluating conflict prevention and peacebuilding activities.
English, , 1,118kb
The purpose of this report is to present the outputs of the Preliminary Study. In addition, this introduction briefly reviews the mandate and scope of the Preliminary study.
English, , 2,488kb
The most important purpose of the evaluation is to understand Dutch interventions. It is not a process evaluation in which the execution of the intervention is followed closely in real time, but a retrospective analysis of a policy process.
English, , 1,658kb
Evaluation of the Norwegian Research and Development Activities in Conflict Prevention and Peace-building
This evaluation aims at assessing the contributions of the four most important Norwegian research institutions to the Norwegian conflict prevention and peacebuilding efforts and the relationship between the Government and the institutions.
English, , 771kb
Two main questions were asked in this evaluation: What has been the added value of the team? And how effective is the team as a working model for joint donor engagement in fragile states?