English, , 793kb
This document is the Final Report for the Concept Study for the forthcoming thematic evaluation of the European Commission (hereafter referred to as “the Commission”) support to Conflict Prevention and Peace Building (CPPB).
English, , 3,097kb
To understand development we must understand the politics that shape it. Evidence shows that in order to deliver sustainable international development we must be able to understand and work with its politics.
English, , 55kb
SADEV is planning a series of evaluations of Swedish support to the legal sector, the first of which is presented below and deals with Sida’s support to justice in reconciliation processes conflict or a post-conflict situation.
French, , 7,913kb
Ces évaluations ont porté plus spécifiquement sur des projets ou grappes de projets se situant dans divers secteurs de concentration de l’aide française, définis par les documents cadres de partenariats.
English, , 194kb
This synthesis of Country Programme Evaluations brings together findings from countries termed fragile states.
English, , 2,685kb
This report presents the findings of an evaluation of a large portion of Norwegian development cooperation that has not previously been systematically evaluated.
English, , 1,274kb
The purpose of the evaluation has been to assess whether Norway has, with its transitional assistance, contributed to increased security and stability, and whether gains achieved are likely to be sustainable.
English, , 1,516kb
This report describes the results of the first pilot test of the new draft OECD DAC guidance on evaluating conflict prevention and peacebuilding activities.
English, , 1,118kb
The purpose of this report is to present the outputs of the Preliminary Study. In addition, this introduction briefly reviews the mandate and scope of the Preliminary study.
English, , 2,488kb
The most important purpose of the evaluation is to understand Dutch interventions. It is not a process evaluation in which the execution of the intervention is followed closely in real time, but a retrospective analysis of a policy process.