English, , 879kb
The evaluation was carried out at the end of 2008 and early 2009 by a team of independent consultants, covering separately five sets of issues: the roles of the states and civil society, livelihoods and poverty, social relations, disaster risk mitigation, and capacity building.
English, , 760kb
The ADR in Tajikistan covered the period from 2001-2008 and offers lessons that can strengthen UNDP programming in Tajikistan as well as contributing to the organization’s effectiveness and accountability.
English, , 846kb
The ADR Uzbekistan covered the period 2000 to mid-2008 and offers lessons that help the detailed design and implementation of the new country programme.
French, , 1,911kb
Cette évaluation a pour objet de porter un jugement sur la pertinence et la cohérence de la dotation au regard des objectifs poursuivis par la France, des paysbénéficiaires et des autres outils bilatéraux et multilatéraux existants ; d’apporter deséléments pour juger de sa performance.
English, , 7,442kb
This ex-post evaluation provides an independent assessment of the effects of two SDC programmes in India, that aimed at the improvement of income opportunities for the poor through viable enterprises.
English, , 847kb
The primary objective of this Evaluation Study is to synthesise the available evidence on what works (or does not work) and why in nutrition programming to address the underlying and basic causes of undernutrition in high burden countries
English, , 1,095kb
This report summarises the document review for the Joint Follow-up Evaluation of the Tsunami Evaluation Coalition – Second Study on Linking Relief Rehabilitation and Development (TEC LRRD 2). It is not an evaluative document but merely an overview of the available documentary sources.
English, , 2,119kb
This evaluation provides an independent assessment of the program results, organisational dimensions and strategic intent of SDC’s gender equality work.
English, , 418kb
The Review was conducted by the Evaluation Division in response to a request by Treasury Board Ministers for “an advance review of CIDA's multilateral delivery channel to be provided to the Treasury Board Secretariat within two fiscal years, by March 31, 2009”.
English, , 2,067kb
The purpose of this evaluation was to assess where SDC stands with regard to knowledge management (KM) and institutional learning (IL) and to gain insights to improve future performance.