English, , 1,351kb
The evaluation confirms that the NGO Foundations are relevant for providing smallscale NGO support. The Foundations assist implementation of Finnish development cooperation policy by supporting key cross-cutting issues and the human-rights based approach to development.
English, , 367kb
The purpose of this evaluation is to draw lessons from the Program’s experience which can be used in formulating new program/projects and in improving the implementation of ongoing assistance not only in PNG but also for ADB’s other developing member countries.
English, , 2,178kb
The SAPE assesses the combined performance of four DPs' educationstrategies and assistance programs in Bangladesh because they are the ones involved in preparing joint country strategies for Bangladesh for the period 2006–2009.
English, , 940kb
The purpose of the evaluation was to examine how successfully appraisal and followup as a part of the administration of NGO projects can be outsourced.
English, , 3,525kb
In August 1995, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) approved pro technical assistance to the Government of Viet Nam for the formulation of the S Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Project.
English, , 866kb
This evaluation commissioned by the European Commission aims at providing an overall independent assessment of its aid delivery through Development Banks and the EIB during the period 1999-2006.
English, , 520kb
This is a report of an independent evaluation of the Austrian Country Programme Serbia 2006-2008. The evaluation was commissioned by ADA with the purpose of drawing conclusions and recommendations for the programming of the future Austrian Cooperation with Serbia.
English, , 1,432kb
The cross-cutting issues have been strongly present in the Finnish development cooperation throughout its history.
English, , 985kb
Irish Aid funding is contributing to significant results with, for example, a reduction in HIV prevalence among adults (aged 15-49) in Sub-Saharan Africa, the region worst hit by the pandemic.
English, , 1,926kb
This evaluation complements the Interim Evaluation carried out at the mid-term of the RAP. It analyses the experience with LAMIT and PSPS in greater depth and on the basis of a longer period of implementation (slightly more than three years).