5-September-2012

English, PDF, 2,055kb

Regional Level Evaluation: Caribbean Region

The evaluation covered the different sectors that the Commission supported and all financing modalities used in this period. Thematically, the focus was on regional economic and political integration but also private sector development, human re-sources development, natural disaster prevention and mitigation, and reduction of drug related crime.

Related Documents

30-August-2012

English, PDF, 2,141kb

Kyrgyz Republic Country Assistance Program Evaluation: Evolving Transition to a Market Economy

The evaluation rates ADB’s overall performance successful as ADB’s three country strategies during the evaluation period (1994–2010) identified the right objectives consistent with ADB’s corporate strategies and with the government’s priorities in addressing the country’s major constraints.

22-August-2012

English, Excel, 4,503kb

Evaluation of Danish Development Support to Afghanistan

Danish support has been in line with Afghan needs. Despite the challenge of on-budget support in the early 2000s the strategic decision to work closely with the new Government has had great value. Denmark is, consequently, seen as a trusted partner.

22-August-2012

English, PDF, 1,025kb

Assessment of Development Results: Liberia

The review found that UNDP has clearly attempted to support national efforts spearheaded by the government to address the underlying structural causes of conflict, working with the Governance Commission, relevant ministries and subsequently established targeted commissions.

21-August-2012

English, PDF, 1,773kb

Evaluation of Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative: Lessons Learned from Support to Civil Society Organisations

Projects were selected for support largely on their individual merit, rather than with a view to building a portfolio of complementary activities that contribute as a whole to the achievement of the program's objectives. This lack of a clear portfolio approach, has at times led to some duplication of activities.

16-August-2012

English, PDF, 1,361kb

Evaluation of the Austrian Development Cooperation Gender Policy between 2004–2011

Austria has committed herself within a framework of international agreements to gender equality and women’s empowerment through gender mainstreaming. The relevance of the gender policy document itself appears to be rather limited. Austrian Development Cooperation staff do know it, but do not use it for providing guidance for their work.

15-August-2012

English, PDF, 884kb

Responding to Crisis: Evaluation of the Australian aid program’s contribution to the national HIV response in Papua New Guinea, 2006–2010

The Australian aid program has played a prominent role in responding to HIV in Papua New Guinea since 1995. The Office of Development Effectiveness conducted a major independent evaluation into AusAID’s contribution to the response.

15-August-2012

English, PDF, 1,620kb

Interregional Network for Cross-border Cooperation and Latin American Integration

In July 2007, the Italian-Latin American Institute launched the “Fronteras Abiertas” project, in cooperation with the Centre for International Policy Studies, and thanks to the financing provided by the General Directorate for Development Cooperation of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This project was concluded in 2011.

14-August-2012

English, PDF, 780kb

The Impact of Rural Business Services on the Economic Well-being of Small Farmers in Nicaragua

The independent evaluation found varied results looking at farm income and household consumption. In addition, although the evaluation was not originally designed to test whether or not farm investments increased as a result of the training and increase in farm income, the evaluators did look at changes in investments in mobile and fixed capital in order to potentially explain why they were not finding changes in household consumption.

Related Documents

2-August-2012

English, PDF, 699kb

Evaluation of NGOs Information and Development Education Projects

The evaluation of the level of effectiveness, because of the limits of the formulation of objectives and indicators and the absence of verification of the level of benefit achieved, required the utilization of proxy indicators and data (above all, quantitative data from monitoring).

< 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 >