English, , 983kb
The evaluation highlights some of the lessons learned from the path that the Spanish cooperation system has been developed to implement the aid effectiveness agenda.
English, , 1,023kb
These case reports are not independent evaluations of the programmes or projects discussed, but rather studies of both the decisions taken by Norway and the UN to support the particular democratic development process.
English, , 1,531kb
Norwegian support for democratic development and UN agencies’ roles in this arekey tenets in Norway’s development assistance. The UN role is seen as particularlyrelevant in fragile situations.
English, , 2,683kb
L’évaluation porte sur les stratégies de coopération avec le Sénégal et leurmise en oeuvre au cours de la période 1996-2008.
English, , 472kb
The evaluation provides recommendations on what can be done to increase the Swedish field offices’ influence on field represen-tatives of other EU member states and the Commission.
English, , 6,559kb
There has been relatively good progress with strengthening the social pillar and to some extent on the environmental side while tangible economic benefits have been rather limited.
English, , 52kb
This brief provides highlights of recommendations for Sweden on influencing the European Commission and EU member states.
English, , 3,538kb
UNDP has helped countries formulate policies for disaster management, but challenges remain in integrating disaster risk reduction in development planning.
English, , 2,596kb
UNDP has responded positively to national Governments in extending support for local governance reforms; however, since that is demand-driven, it has at times resulted in an ad hoc rather than strategic approach.
English, , 1,481kb
The present evaluation of the work and contribution of the United Nations Development Programme at the regional level covers both UNDP regional programmes and the relevant UNDP institutional arrangements, especially thework of the regional service centres.