English, , 601kb
The UNDP Evaluation Office (EO) has conducted an evaluation to assess UNDP contributions to development results in Argentina.The evaluation covers two programming cycles, 2002-2004 and 2005-2008, extended to 2009.
English, , 881kb
The Assessment of Development Results (ADR) covers the Country Cooperation Framework period from 2003 to 2008.
English, , 567kb
The ADR covered the sub-regional programme of the nine member countries of the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) and Barbados over the ongoing (2005-2009) and previous (2001-2004) programming cycles.
English, , 943kb
The ADR in Bosnia and Herzegovina covered the period from 2001-2008 and offers lessons that can strengthen UNDP programming in Bosnia and Herzegovina as well as contributing to the organization’s effectiveness and accountability.
English, Excel, 1,627kb
This report is a summary of an evaluation of the Business/Development Partnership (WiPa) Program conducted between March and December 2008 by the Global Public Policy Institute.
English, , 1,752kb
Evaluation of Norwegian Development Cooperation through Norwegian Non-Governmental Organisations in Northern Uganda (2003–2007)
The evaluation of development aid through Norwegian NGOs in Northern Uganda is the second country oriented report in response to the Rattsø commision. It aims at assessing the achievements of Norwegian organisations and their partners in this part of Uganda.
English, , 879kb
The evaluation was carried out at the end of 2008 and early 2009 by a team of independent consultants, covering separately five sets of issues: the roles of the states and civil society, livelihoods and poverty, social relations, disaster risk mitigation, and capacity building.
English, , 760kb
The ADR in Tajikistan covered the period from 2001-2008 and offers lessons that can strengthen UNDP programming in Tajikistan as well as contributing to the organization’s effectiveness and accountability.
English, , 846kb
The ADR Uzbekistan covered the period 2000 to mid-2008 and offers lessons that help the detailed design and implementation of the new country programme.
French, , 1,911kb
Cette évaluation a pour objet de porter un jugement sur la pertinence et la cohérence de la dotation au regard des objectifs poursuivis par la France, des paysbénéficiaires et des autres outils bilatéraux et multilatéraux existants ; d’apporter deséléments pour juger de sa performance.