Joint Evaluation of Support to Anti-Corruption Efforts (2002-2009) - Synthesis report

Has donors’ approach to anti-corruption work been adapted to circumstances in different countries? What are the results of support for combating corruption? These were some of the questions that this joint evaluation sought to answer.

Related Documents

• Joint Evaluation of Support to Anti-Corruption Efforts (2002-2009) - Tanzania Country Report
• Joint Evaluation of Support to Anti-Corruption Efforts (2002-2009) - Zambia Country Report
• Joint Evaluation of Support to Anti-Corruption Efforts (2002-2009) - Bangladesh Country Report
• Joint Evaluation of Support to Anti-Corruption Efforts (2002-2009) - Vietnam Country Report
• Joint Evaluation of Support to Anti-Corruption Efforts (2002-2009) - Nicaragua Country Report

Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lessons Learned

Why, despite unprecedented investment in anti-corruption in the last fifteen years and since the implementation of global monitoring instruments and global legislation, have so few countries managed to register progress? These were some of the questions that this report sought to answer.

Related Documents

• Evaluation Insights #4: Effective institutions and good governance for development

Democracy Support through the United Nations - Literature Review

Its purpose is to provide an overview of the knowledge base in order to generate the foundations for the analytical framework and methodology to be applied in the field.

Related Documents

• Democracy Support through the United Nations
• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Mapping Study

Democracy Support through the United Nations - Mapping Study

Funding for democratic development through the UN has trebled over the period, but unevenly across the seven different DemDev dimensions.

Related Documents

• Democracy Support through the United Nations
• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Literature Review

Democracy Support through the United Nations

Norwegian support for democratic development and UN agencies’ roles in this arekey tenets in Norway’s development assistance. The UN role is seen as particularlyrelevant in fragile situations.

Related Documents

• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Literature Review
• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Mapping Study
• Democracy Support through the United Nations
• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Case Report: Sudan
• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Case Report: Pakistan
• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Case Report: Nepal
• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Case Report: Malawi

Democracy Support through the United Nations - Case Report: Sudan

These case reports are not independent evaluations of the programmes or projects discussed, but rather studies of both the decisions taken by Norway and the UN to support the particular democratic development process.

Related Documents

• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Literature Review
• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Mapping Study
• Democracy Support through the United Nations
• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Case Report: Guatemala
• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Case Report: Mozambique
• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Case Report: Malawi
• Democracy Support through the United Nations - Case Report: Nepal

Evaluation of the Norwegian Centre for Democracy Support 2002-2009

This report, prepared at the request of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, presentsthe evaluation of one of the more controversial parts of Norwegian developmentcooperation, the institutions and arrangements for channelling support to politicalparties in partner countries.

Support to Legislatures – Synthesis Study

The study discusses different models of legislatures and political and electoral systems, with particular emphasis on fragile states. It also presents an overview of agencies specialised in this field, and of trends of donor support.