DEReC › Finland › Publications & Documents › Corporate evaluations and annual reports
31-December-2012
English, PDF, 3,417kb
The purpose of the fifth meta-evaluation since 1991 was to analyse and draw lessons from the projects evaluations of 2010 and 2011. It compared the findings with 2 previous meta-analysis and 2 other evaluations. OECD/DAC and EU quality standards, as well as many cross-cutting type objectives where used as criteria. The novelty in this meta-evaluation was to study projects of the ten evaluation reports included in the sample.
31-October-2011
English, , 9,893kb
The evaluation is meant to deepen the understanding of the results-based approach and management requirements. Managing for results depends not only on technical methodology, but also on the way the development cooperation programme is organised and managed.
20-April-2011
English, , 6,718kb
The weaknesses of the development cooperation of Finland included the rigidityof the organisation, and the highly centralised decision-making. The Ministry was neither particularly receptive to constructive criticism nor was it an organisation which harnessed lessons from the past.
12-May-2010
English, , 4,867kb
This Synthesis of Evaluations brings together a total of 22 programmatic and thematic evaluation reports commissioned during 2008-2010 by the development evaluation office of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.
6-April-2010
English, , 4,867kb
This Synthesis of Evaluations brings together a total of 22 programmatic and thematic evaluation reports commissioned during 2008-2010 by the development evaluation office of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.
11-March-2010
Finnish, , 3,435kb
The purpose of the evaluation was the identification of the evolution of the development cooperation in the water sector, extraction from the lessons learnt and recommendations for the future support to the sector.
4-December-2009
English, , 2,173kb
The overall purpose of meta-analyses is to offer an opportunity to learn from past experience and to extract good practices for quality development of development cooperation through assessing the quality of development evaluations.
Follow us
E-mail Alerts Blogs