DEReC › By Country › Nicaragua
14-August-2012
English, PDF, 780kb
The independent evaluation found varied results looking at farm income and household consumption. In addition, although the evaluation was not originally designed to test whether or not farm investments increased as a result of the training and increase in farm income, the evaluators did look at changes in investments in mobile and fixed capital in order to potentially explain why they were not finding changes in household consumption.
13-March-2012
English, , 768kb
This evaluation of the Finnish country programmes with Nepal, Nicaragua and Tanzania over the past decade and focused on how anti-poverty development policies and the agents of policy implementation interacted, and influenced each country programme.
24-January-2012
English, , 3,097kb
The purpose of the evaluation is to clarify the relationship between development policy and cooperation programming, to describe the mechanisms that were used to translate policy into practice, and to identify strengths, weaknesses and lessons learned.
24-January-2012
English, , 2,544kb
The purpose of the evaluation is to clarify the relationship between development policy and cooperation programming, to describe the mechanisms that were used to translate policy into practice, and to identify strengths, weaknesses and lessons learned.
18-October-2011
English, , 1,744kb
Has donors’ approach to anti-corruption work been adapted to circumstances in different countries? What are the results of support for combating corruption? These were some of the questions that this joint evaluation sought to answer.
17-October-2011
English, , 1,986kb
Why, despite unprecedented investment in anti-corruption in the last fifteen years and since the implementation of global monitoring instruments and global legislation, have so few countries managed to register progress? These were some of the questions that this report sought to answer.
16-September-2010
English, , 2,326kb
In May 2005, nine donors signed the Joint Financing Arrangement (JFA). The Netherlands was the third donor and the largest bilateral donor of budget support, with a 16.4% share in the total.
3-September-2010
English, , 505kb
Since 2005, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) has been increasingly providing budget support to its partner countries, mainly by joining existing budget support operations. In the period 2005-2009, it provided budget support totalling EUR 31.7 million to four countries.
1-September-2010
English, , 780kb
Traditional democracy support only is likely to yield few concrete results. And projects focusing only on concrete – that is, public works – tend to be few and expensive, of questionable quality and often not reflecting priorities within the community.
1-July-2010
English, , 649kb
The purpose of this evaluation is to scrutinize higher-education-support programs financed by Austrian Development Agency (ADA) in Kosovo, Serbia and Nicaragua, with a specific look into recommendations for future activities.
Follow us
E-mail Alerts Blogs