Reports


  • 22-June-2011

    English

    The United States - DAC Peer Review of Development Co-operation

    The United States is the world’s largest development and humanitarian donor by far. Its recent renewed ambition of global leadership on development is supported by new strategic orientations and ways to deliver development co-operation.

    Related Documents
  • 11-January-2011

    English

    Policy changes in DAC members' development co-operation, 2010

    In August 2010, we asked donors to provide updates on their efforts to adjust their policies to keep aid commitments and help partner countries meet the MDGs. Their responses are presented here.

    Related Documents
  • 20-December-2010

    English

  • 29-November-2010

    English

    Portugal (2010) DAC Peer Review - Main Findings and Recommendations

    Portugal will need to triple development assistance over the coming five years if it is to meet an EU target of giving 0.7% of gross national income (GNI) to aid by 2015.

  • 27-October-2010

    English

    Germany (2010) DAC Peer Review - Main Findings and Recommendations

    Germany embarks on reform of its development co-operation and aims to improve the quality and increase the quantity of its aid.

  • 8-July-2010

    English

  • 9-June-2010

    English

    Belgium (2010) DAC Peer Review - Main Findings and Recommendations

    Belgium spent USD 2.6 billion on official development assistance (ODA) in 2009, which amounted to 0.55% of its gross national income (GNI).

  • 1-June-2010

    English

  • 24-November-2009

    English

    Italy - OECD Peer Review of Development Co-operation, 2014

    Italian Official Development assistance, or ODA, decreased steadily between 2008 and 2012, due in part to pressures from the economic crisis, but it rose in 2013.

    Related Documents
  • 27-August-2009

    English, , 364kb

    Survey on the levels of decentralisation to the field in DAC members’ development co-operation system

    The survey comprised 4 topics: policy, financial authority, staffing and roles and systems. Nineteen DAC members responded and the main findings are presented in the document with a summary of each member’s survey results in the Annex 1.

    Related Documents
  • << < 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 > >>