Germany (2010) DAC Peer Review - Main Findings and Recommendations

Germany embarks on reform of its development co-operation and aims to improve the quality and increase the quantity of its aid.

Related Documents

• OECD-Bericht zur deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit
• Germany (2005), DAC Peer Review: Main Findings and Recommendations
• Germany (2001) Development Co-operation Review
• Effective Aid Management: Twelve Lessons from DAC Peer Reviews
• List of Peer Reviews of DAC Members

DAC Peer Review Content Guide

The Guide aims to provide a conceptual framework for all Peer Reviews, providing priority questions for each of the standard sections of the review, as well as a framework for general or theme-specific learning across several reviews.

Information Note on the DAC Peer Review process

This note gives guidance on the process for preparing Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Peer Reviews. It is for the use of all parties involved in the review - the reviewed member, the examiners and the DAC Secretariat.

United Kingdom (2010) DAC Peer Review - Main Findings and Recommendations

The United Kingdom’s aid volume was USD 11.5 billion in 2009, representing 0.52% of its gross national income (GNI).

Related Documents

• United Kingdom (2006), DAC Peer Review: Main Findings and Recommendations
• United Kingdom (2001), Development Co-operation Review: Main Findings and Recommendations
• List of Peer Reviews of DAC Members
• Effective Aid Management: Twelve Lessons from DAC Peer Reviews

Belgium (2010) DAC Peer Review - Main Findings and Recommendations

Belgium spent USD 2.6 billion on official development assistance (ODA) in 2009, which amounted to 0.55% of its gross national income (GNI).

Related Documents

• List of Peer Reviews of DAC Members
• Belgium (2005), DAC Peer Review: Main Findings and Recommendations
• Effective Aid Management: Twelve Lessons from DAC Peer Reviews

Special Review of Poland's development co-operation (2010)

The OECD encourages Poland to strengthen its development co-operation policy, set a clear path for aid increases and move from small-scale aid projects to multi-year aid programmes.

Related Documents

• DAC Global Relations
• What is a Peer Review?
• Effective Aid Management: Twelve Lessons from DAC Peer Reviews
• Managing Aid: Practices of DAC Member Countries
• Slovak Republic (2011) DAC Special Review
• DAC Special Review of the Republic of Korea's Development Co-operation
• Czech Republic (2007), DAC Special Review of the Czech Republic's Development Co-operation

Belgium - DAC Peer Reviews of Development Co-operation

Belgium’s development co-operation has gained new momentum over the last two years, driven by international commitments and a process of self-reflection

Germany - DAC Peer Reviews of Development Co-operation

Germany has been one of the world’s largest bilateral donors for the past two decades, but it spent only 0.35% of its national income on official development assistance ODA) in 2009.

Japan - DAC Peer Reviews of Development Co-operation

Japan’s net official development assistance (ODA) was USD 9.3 billion in 2002, making it the world’s second largest donor. Japan was the largest aid donor for almost a decade, from 1992 to 2001, until economic pressures led the government to reduce the size of its ODA

Italy - DAC Peer Review of Development Co-operation

Despite the challenges remaining, the DAC notes some improvement in Italian aid management since 2008. It welcomes Italy’s intention to focus on 35 priority countries, the greater authority given to Italy’s embassies and technical offices to formulate programmes and deliver aid, and the Steering Committee on Development Cooperation’s high level policy direction.