Latest Documents


  • 8-September-2015

    English

    OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Belgium 2015

    This review of the development co-operation efforts of Belgium examines its policies, performance and implementation. It takes an integrated, system-wide perspective on the development co-operation and humanitarian assistance activities of the member under review.

  • 22-June-2015

    English

    OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: New Zealand 2015

    The OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of DAC members. The policies and programmes of each member are critically examined approximately once every five years. DAC peer reviews assess the performance of a given member, not just that of its development co-operation agency, and examine both policy and implementation. They take an integrated,

  • 22-June-2015

    English

    New Zealand - DAC Peer Review of Development Co-operation 2015

    While New Zealand is a comparatively small donor, it boasts an internationally-recognised aid programme with specific understanding of the unique Pacific context. It is seen as a flexible and predictable humanitarian donor.

    Related Documents
  • 15-January-2015

    English

    OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Austria 2015

    This periodic review (roughly every five years) of the individual development co-operation efforts of Austria assesses the performance of Austria's programme, not just that of its development co-operation agency, and examines both policy and implementation. It takes an integrated, system-wide perspective.

  • 15-January-2015

    English

    Austria - DAC Peer Review of Development Co-operation, 2015

    Austria should set a timeframe to increase its aid budget in line with a pledge to allocate 0.7% of its gross national income (GNI) to development aid, according to an OECD Review.

    Related Documents
  • 7-January-2015

    English, PDF, 1,610kb

    Measuring and managing results in development co-operation

    Providing insights into current practices, this review presents the reader with specific examples on how agencies have addressed important aspects of the results agenda such as measuring results, using results information, supporting partner countries’ results systems and developing new instruments to link results with decision-making.

    Related Documents
  • 17-December-2014

    English

    OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: United Kingdom 2014

    This review of the development co-operation efforts of the United Kingdom examines its policies, performance and implementation. It takes an integrated, system-wide perspective on the development co-operation and humanitarian assistance activities of the member under review.

  • 17-December-2014

    English

    United Kingdom - DAC Peer Review of Development Co-operation

    In its latest Peer Review of the United Kingdom, the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) notes that raising its official development assistance (ODA) by 30.5% to GBP 11.4 billion in 2013 made the UK the world’s No. 2 donor by aid volume after the United States.

    Related Documents
  • 11-December-2014

    English

    Peer Reviews of DAC Members

    Peer Reviews of DAC

    Related Documents
  • 2-December-2014

    English

    OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Ireland 2014

    The OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of DAC members. This peer review of Ireland reviews its development policies and programmes. It assesses not just the performance of its development co-operation agency, but also policy and implementation. It takes an integrated, system-wide perspective on the development co-operation and humanitarian

  • 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 > >>