| Best Practice N°1: |
Resolving and publishing issues of interpretation or application |
| Best Practice N°1: |
Robust use of Article 25(3) power to relieve double taxation |
| Best Practice Nº1: |
Principled approach to resolution of cases |
| Best Practice Nº3: |
Transparency and simplicity of procedures for accessing and using the MAP |
| Best Practice Nº4: |
Providing complete, accurate, and timely information to the competent authorities |
| Best Practice Nº5: |
Allowing electronic submissions |
|
| Best Practice Nº5: |
Allowing early resolution of cases |
|
| Best Practice Nº6: |
Earlier notification of a potential case |
|
| Best Practice Nº7: |
Liberal interpretation of time limits and advising of treaty rights |
| Best Practice Nº8: |
Avoiding exclusion from MAP relief due to late adjustments or late notification |
| Best Practice Nº10: |
Consideration of MAP assistance for cases described as “tax avoidance" |
| Best Practice Nº10: |
Countries eliminate or minimize “exceptions” to MAP |
| Best Practice Nº11: |
Taxpayer presentations to competent authorities |
| Best Practice Nº12: |
Cooperation and transparency |
| Best Practice Nº14: |
Face-to-face meetings between competent authorities |
| Best Practice Nº14: |
Bilateral process improvements |
| Best Practice Nº15: |
Decision summaries |
| Best Practice Nº16: |
Recommendation for MAP cases beyond two years |
| Best Practice Nº17: |
Avoid blocking MAP access via audit settlements or unilateral APAs |
|
| Best Practice Nº18: |
Interest relief |
| Best Practice Nº19: |
Suspension of collections during MAP |
| Best Practice Nº20: |
Readily available access to a competent authority |
| Best Practice Nº21: |
Independence and resources of a competent authority |
| Best Practice Nº20: |
Performance indicators for the competent authority function and staff |
| Best Practice Nº23: |
Implementing and promoting ACAP and bilateral APA programs |
Follow us
E-mail Alerts Blogs