Long abstract

Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS - Chapter 3: The Professional Development of Teachers: Tables and Figures

Table 3.1. Participation of teachers in professional development in the previous 18 months (2007-08)              
Table 3.1a. Amount of professional development undertaken by teachers in the previous 18 months (2007-08) - teacher characteristics              
Table 3.1b. Amount of professional development undertaken by teachers in the previous 18 months (2007-08) - school characteristics              
Table 3.1c. (Web only) Percentage distribution of days of professional development undertaken by teachers in the previous 18 months (2007-08)              
Table 3.1d. (Web only) Percentile distribution of days of professional development undertaken by teachers in the previous 18 months (2007-08)              
Table 3.2. Types of professional development undertaken by teachers (2007-08)              
Table 3.3. Teachers who wanted to participate in more development than they did in the previous 18 months (2007-08)              
Table 3.4. Teachers' high professional development needs (2007-08)              
Table 3.5. Support for professional development undertaken by teachers (2007-08)              
Table 3.5a. (Web only) Average days of development taken by teachers and desire for more development according to the level of costs teachers paid (2007-08)              
Table 3.6. Frequency of mentoring and induction programmes (2007-08)              
Table 3.6a. (Web only) Average days of development taken by teachers according to whether a formal induction or mentoring programme was in place (2007-08)              
Table 3.6b. (Web only) Teachers who wanted to participate in more development than they did in the previous 18 months according to whether a formal induction or mentoring programme was in place (2007-08)              
Table 3.7. Reasons for not participating in more professional development (2007-08)              
Table 3.8. Impact of different types of professional development undertaken by teachers (2007-08)              
              
Figure 3.1. Percentage of teachers who undertook some professional development in the previous 18 months  (2007-08)               
Figure 3.2. Comparison of the level and intensity of  participation in professional development  (2007-08)               
Figure 3.3. Days of professional development taken- Interquartile range (2007-08)               
Figure 3.4. Participation rates by type of professional development activity (2007-08)               
Figure 3.5. Percentage of teachers who wanted more development than they received in the 18 months prior to the survey (2007-08)               
Figure 3.6. Areas of greatest development need (2007-08)              
Figure 3.7. Index of professional development need (2007-08)               
Figure 3.8 Comparison of  unsatisfied demand  for professional development and amount undertaken (2007-08)              
Figure 3.9.  Types of support received for professional development (2007-08)               
Figure 3.10. Average days of development taken by teachers according to personal payment level (2007-08)               
Figure 3.11. Level of personal payment by type of development activity1  (2007-08)               
Figure 3.12.  Percentage of teachers receiving scheduled time compared to average days of development undertaken (2007-08)              
Figure 3.13. Percentage of teachers in schools with no formal induction or mentoring programmes (2007-08)               
Figure 3.14. Reasons for not taking more professional development  (2007-08)               
Figure 3.15. Comparison of impact and participation by types of development activity (2007-08)               

OECD Education Lighthouse

Register to join this collaborative space and help chart the way for the education sector to navigate through the current crisis and shape the post-crisis economy and society.

OECD Education Lighthouse

Focus

This book proposes a value-added model of measuring which provides a more fair, precise and quantitative tool for assessing students’ progress.

Measuring Improvements in Learning Outcomes: Best Practices to Assess the Value-Added of Schools

Focus

Across OECD countries nearly one in three adults has only primary or lower secondary education.

No More Failures: Ten Steps to Equity in Education

Focus

Find out how early childhood education and care (ECEC) policy has progressed in OECD countries.

Starting Strong II: Early Childhood Education and Care

What is the framework of the PISA 2006 survey for assessing students in maths, reading, scientific literacy and attitudes to science? Find out more.

Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006